12th November 2009, 12:14 PM
what is being said here is perhaps proof of what this forum is designed for. remember that without it there would have been nowhere to announce or debate this. as kevin, chiz and others pont out, this can only be dealt with if people stop shrugging of responsibility for their future. if you are a corporate grade ifa member then it is your duty to stand for the future of archaeology. I am more than willing to help in whatever way is appropriate. this is not an ifa bash.. this perhaps highlights what the ifa could become.
I know bajrs limits - often be called a one man dictatorship - however, I have been constant in my belief, open in my actions and honest. so for what its worth and leaving out my personal feelings I would offer the opportunities of communication that bajr holds to aid this support of an ifa committed to supporting fieldstaff. I can't as yet agree with other aspects of control given the current circumstances, but if you want an ifa that represents you, then trust and affirmative action is required. over to you
I know bajrs limits - often be called a one man dictatorship - however, I have been constant in my belief, open in my actions and honest. so for what its worth and leaving out my personal feelings I would offer the opportunities of communication that bajr holds to aid this support of an ifa committed to supporting fieldstaff. I can't as yet agree with other aspects of control given the current circumstances, but if you want an ifa that represents you, then trust and affirmative action is required. over to you
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Thomas Rainborough 1647