15th November 2005, 02:54 PM
Quote:quote:An alternative would be to cover it in WB specs, by including an ongoing liaison role after the end of the WB itself, involving (say) a weekly site meeting/inspection until after all ground-disturbing works are complete. That way, any design changes or unauthorised work could be identified and the developer/construction firm would know they were under continuing oversight.
1man1desk
Something like that would make sense. Just the suggestion that the archaeological monitoring didn't end when the watching brief was over.