8th November 2005, 11:23 PM
in response to eggy, I do find that the results sections of my assessment reports do tend to be rather samey because I am essentially communicating the same data, just with different numbers, and it seems pointless to try and alter the way it is written. Interpretations are interpretations, and therefore have to be different for every site and should not follow a strict formula. I suppose part of the problem with archaeological reports is that they are part scientific and part artsy and it is sometimes tricky to try and accommodate both in one report.
++ i spend my days rummaging around in dead people ++
++ i spend my days rummaging around in dead people ++