7th January 2008, 03:00 AM
Hi boss,
As this is the second thread on this topic and given that my comments on the other thread were somewhat flippant I thought that I should take the topic a little more seriously. Firstly, why has the amputation of the hand of a statue of King Alfred in Wantage raised your ire so much? A Google search of vandalised statues gave me 213,000 results, what was it about this one that got you so annoyed? Gagumph (great name)notes that drunken vandalism is one of the few recreational activities to be indulged in within the environs of Wantage, a few months ago I priced up an eval in Wantage and while waiting for the bus back to Oxford, apart from going to the pub, the only thing I could find to do was perusing the second hand book shelves in Help the Aged. So, some acts of vandalism such as the Wantage amputation appear to be the result of bugger all else to do. Other acts of vandalism, based on the links supplied in your post, against the Little Mermaid and the Buddhas in Bamiyan appear to be politically motivated; an entirely different order of vandalism and depending on your political point of view justified or not. A few years ago the head of Winston Churchill's statue in Trafalgar Square was bewigged with a mohawk of green turf and the statue of Arthur 'bomber' Harris is regularly daubed with red paint. In antiquity many Roman statues were defaced as acts of political defiance against the state and the Egyptians removed the faces from pharaohs statues as well as removing hieroglyphs lauding their achievements in an attempt to obliterate the history of their politically undesirable predecessors. Pompeii has revealed political and personal graffiti on walls of many buildings, and the stone walls of Skara Brae were graffitied by Vikings; an act of wanton vandalism or an act of cultural significance worthy of study by archaeologists and historians, it all depends on your point of view. In the 21st century tagging tube trains is the work of antisocial elements within our present society while the work of graffiti artist Banksy when sprayed in the right place can be displayed in the Tate Modern and sold for a six figure sum while a similar level of artistic endeavour if sprayed on a historic monument would be condemned out of hand as vandalism of the worst order. Maybe we should stand back and think about the reasons why vandalism occurs and its cultural significance rather than indulging in knee jerk reactions based on the actions of bored drunken idiots in small market towns in South Oxfordshire.
Sorry for the rant boss, this one kinda got to me.
Oz
As this is the second thread on this topic and given that my comments on the other thread were somewhat flippant I thought that I should take the topic a little more seriously. Firstly, why has the amputation of the hand of a statue of King Alfred in Wantage raised your ire so much? A Google search of vandalised statues gave me 213,000 results, what was it about this one that got you so annoyed? Gagumph (great name)notes that drunken vandalism is one of the few recreational activities to be indulged in within the environs of Wantage, a few months ago I priced up an eval in Wantage and while waiting for the bus back to Oxford, apart from going to the pub, the only thing I could find to do was perusing the second hand book shelves in Help the Aged. So, some acts of vandalism such as the Wantage amputation appear to be the result of bugger all else to do. Other acts of vandalism, based on the links supplied in your post, against the Little Mermaid and the Buddhas in Bamiyan appear to be politically motivated; an entirely different order of vandalism and depending on your political point of view justified or not. A few years ago the head of Winston Churchill's statue in Trafalgar Square was bewigged with a mohawk of green turf and the statue of Arthur 'bomber' Harris is regularly daubed with red paint. In antiquity many Roman statues were defaced as acts of political defiance against the state and the Egyptians removed the faces from pharaohs statues as well as removing hieroglyphs lauding their achievements in an attempt to obliterate the history of their politically undesirable predecessors. Pompeii has revealed political and personal graffiti on walls of many buildings, and the stone walls of Skara Brae were graffitied by Vikings; an act of wanton vandalism or an act of cultural significance worthy of study by archaeologists and historians, it all depends on your point of view. In the 21st century tagging tube trains is the work of antisocial elements within our present society while the work of graffiti artist Banksy when sprayed in the right place can be displayed in the Tate Modern and sold for a six figure sum while a similar level of artistic endeavour if sprayed on a historic monument would be condemned out of hand as vandalism of the worst order. Maybe we should stand back and think about the reasons why vandalism occurs and its cultural significance rather than indulging in knee jerk reactions based on the actions of bored drunken idiots in small market towns in South Oxfordshire.
Sorry for the rant boss, this one kinda got to me.
Oz