Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The chancellors watching brief!
Bad idea.

Archaelogical work on development sites should not be paid for from the public purse, it should be paid for by the developer. Otherwise, we (the taxpayers) are subsidising developers to trash the archaeology. That's a bad thing in itself, but even worse because it removes any incentive for them to reduce their impact on the archaeology. I know (because I work with them regularly) that they often do feel an incentive to do that as things stand.


to let, fully furnished
1man1desk-Greetings! Good grief! I do believe we`re on the same page!! Agree with you wholeheartedly sire.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Watching the Curator BAJR 19 10,194 7th June 2012, 10:39 AM
Last Post: serpentine
  A better brighter Britain but not for watching brief conditions gwyl 22 13,309 9th December 2010, 03:15 PM
Last Post: the invisible man
  First Watching Brief Nerves thundercat 43 18,864 23rd July 2010, 01:16 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Longest Watching Brief drpeterwardle 29 13,837 1st July 2009, 12:18 PM
Last Post: Unitof1
  No Watching Brief on Pipelines!?! AchingTrenchHeadAtADesk 36 26,463 27th August 2008, 02:49 PM
Last Post: Sparky
  The value of a watching brief Post-Med Potterer 52 39,818 21st February 2006, 02:38 PM
Last Post: 1man1desk

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)