Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evaluating urban sites
Yes, it's definately unethical, its just not illegal. It would certainly be outside the code of contuct of the IfA as there is an obligation to publish, and is therefore more likely to be carried out by the more ethically challenged contractors.
Winding up in court would be slightly more inconvenient than falling out of favour with IFA methinks? Getting well into the territory of 'intellectual rights' anyway, it's not my knowledge to disclose, it's entirely in the land-owner's ball-court, fraud if any would be from how would any potential purchaser know to come and ask me anyway (this was best part of 20 years ago, I believe), and I've certainly got no way to know if anyone's planning to buy it - time for a reality check? Am now aware of something not dissimilar down in the Midlands in IFA-stronghold territory, so as I suspected it's not an uncommon occurrence...

Oh, and by the way, wasn't my project (or anyone else working here), I merely know about it so don't go measuring me up for a cell just yet! :face-approve:
Slightly related, although in the world of ecology, is a story I heard from a planning authority friend about a big housing construction company. He had refused them planning permission because the land they wanted to build on contained a very important wild meadow. The company hissed and spat......then came back after talking to their solicitors saying that if they bought the land, as the landowner they could plough it, destroying the meadow and thus getting round the problem. My friend was powerless to stop them.

I'm guessing similar loopholes exist in archaeological planning rules, farmers deep ploughing, driving over earthworkse etc.
Sorry Jack - not true if the site is designated a SSSI.

One would imagine for a LA to refuse planning on the grounds of a 'very important wild meadow' that the site would be designated which imposes a duty upon the owner to maintain the SSSI. Ploughing I imagine would not fall within that remit and a land owner who knowingly ignores the management plan for a SSSI can be subject to an enforcement notice to repair or remediate damage .....I will see if I can find you a link describing SSSI and their legal status....

Here you go:
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evaluating Digital Dwelling film - a new way to interpret the past. BAJR 13 8,919 15th January 2014, 02:29 PM
Last Post: P Prentice
  Anyone have a photo of Patricia M Christie who excavated sites on Salisbury plain ? BAJR 1 2,249 10th June 2013, 08:31 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  Rural Life in an Urban and Industrial World BAJR 1 1,920 9th March 2013, 01:39 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  Demolition of important sites. John Wells 9 6,789 25th February 2012, 05:32 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Box sections on rescue sites Bier Keller 17 9,094 12th October 2011, 07:27 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Viking Coastal Occupation Sites Of Western Britain Mannin 4 3,474 9th May 2011, 11:59 AM
Last Post: BAJR
  Geotagging archaeological sites IndiJones 1 1,718 19th September 2010, 08:42 PM
Last Post: IndiJones
  English Heritage consultation on prehistoric,urban and historic industrial research BAJR 2 2,462 22nd August 2010, 08:13 PM
Last Post: GnomeKing
  An introduction to dealing with Iron Slag on archaeological sites. BAJR 2 2,706 17th July 2010, 09:03 AM
Last Post: BAJR
  Motorbikes and 4x4s wrecking Welsh heritage sites BAJR 11 6,024 5th July 2010, 08:27 PM
Last Post: Reggie

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)