Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
103 construction companies fined by the Office of Fair Trading
#1
There was a story on the Today programme this morning about an Office of Fair Trading investigation into construction company tendering practice. The story also featured in the Times.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/bu...762924.ece
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...
Reply
#2
Heard that one... and had a wry smile! :o)
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Reply
#3
Perhaps they'd run a story on the widespread evidence for price-fixing in archaeology... that is price fixing in as much as we fix it that our prices seem to get lower and lower every year. They probably wouldn't believe any industry would be that stupid. :p
Reply
#4
david Wrote:Heard that one... and had a wry smile!

Made me smile as well.
Reply
#5
And indeed it was due to exactly what Red Earth suggested.. Smile

I'll pay to do that site... ooops! thats wrong!
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Reply
#6
thier noses firmly in the trough again (oink, oink)
course, construction used this practice to increse thier profits rather than win work ... perhapes not a bad idea after all...

the base-line appears to be whether Value For Money was delivered by the construction companies ... if that could be demonstrated for archaeology (eg graduate workforce/skilled technicians, public interaction, peer reviewed results) then perhapes there would be no problem...?
Reply
#7
GnomeKing Wrote:the base-line appears to be whether Value For Money was delivered by the construction companies ... if that could be demonstrated for archaeology (eg graduate workforce/skilled technicians, public interaction, peer reviewed results) then perhapes there would be no problem...?

Indeed, but it depends on who is defining what is valuable - if developers (i.e. the principle client) place no value on things like graduate workforce, public interaction, peer reviewed results (although they might be forced to see these things as valuable by a dilligent curatorial service) then they are valueless. The clients of developers will, or at least should, see the value in good work on the other hand.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  University of Bradford Archaeology and Environmental Sciences Employment Fair 2013 Bonesgirl 8 5,624 22nd January 2013, 07:58 PM
Last Post: Bonesgirl
  Excavation Licenses indicate continued reduction in archaeological and construction a BAJR 1 1,363 13th January 2012, 09:40 AM
Last Post: BAJR
  Bad day at the office?! vulpes 20 8,251 1st November 2011, 06:37 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Field and Office based Archaeologists - Various BAJR 1 1,339 7th September 2010, 06:01 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  Assistant Office Manager - Northern Office BAJR 1 1,241 1st July 2010, 06:22 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  RICS Event - How to get paid under the new Construction Act BAJR Host 1 1,394 21st January 2010, 10:56 AM
Last Post: BAJR Host
  construction industry i_love_rocks 2 1,775 2nd April 2009, 02:53 PM
Last Post: kevin wooldridge
  Japan - Worries about Archaeological Companies BAJR Host 9 4,437 6th August 2007, 02:16 PM
Last Post: 1man1desk
  Reducing Archaeological Risk In Construction BAJR Host 1 1,698 27th November 2006, 10:15 AM
Last Post: BAJR Host
  Office Waller trowelhead 17 9,182 12th October 2005, 06:56 PM
Last Post: drpeterwardle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)