4th June 2009, 04:52 PM
Quote:quote: I do not agree with everything David says, or does, despite being pretty much 100% supportive of him. His decisions are there to be questioned and queried, and I believe he supports this wholeheartedly
I do absolutely... as I am not always correct... I am after all human, although I do spend time and efforttalking to experts at ACAS, Citizens Advice, the Inland Revenue to check my facts.
It is there to be questioned, and hopefully answered.... though I do suggest that contacting the unit directly may be useful.
There are indeed people advertising 60 quid self employed - and indeed they are banned from BAJR. this is not the case here, I have checked for suitable insurance, additional remunerations, etc...
normally a self employed person would be looking at charging 100 quid plus. This is however what one would term 'Casual' not a type of employment I like... however.. given the unique circumstance of the job AND the reasons given .. (which include the problem of not getting paid until end of August - if going the full employment route) led me to the conclusion, that with all things considered, the job did make the minimum requirements, and was a three month contract at that.! I would not accept it again - as once in exceptional circumstances is ok, but not to be repeated.
It is work, it is a decent ammount of time, and if people think it is illegal, then please do not hesitate to contact them or the relevant authourity (after all, I can be wrong)
I do also encourage people to question my actions, after all, I am but one person, but hope that BAJR is everyone.
"Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage."
Niccolo Machiavelli
