3rd April 2014, 01:22 PM
robot Wrote:Hm, may I throw an interesting little sideline at you all?
Now Im no expert like other august members- but there are other text for which, it can be argued, there is equally, or even less proof that the events recorded are true, that ARE accepted by archaeology. The most obvious one is the King list, from which a lot of Sumerian chronology is derived. Similarly Egyptian chronology, Mayan inscriptions...heck even the chronology of the "Dark Ages" has been in doubt (the King Otto question).
I think you'll find things like that are unproved theories that some archaeologists believe based on current evidence....not true
robot Wrote:Perhaps its how Creationism and other theories, should be used in the teaching of science. Some say on here that Creationists are "nutters"- but what is there about this theory that has so many people believing in it even in modern times?
People are (as a whole) stupid.
Just because it is believed to be true doesn't make it so......and has no relevance to the argument whether it is or not.
Look at the belief that the earth is flat or that the atmosphere is made of glass spheres. Just coz millions of people believed it to be true didn't make it so.
robot Wrote:Working from there- a case can be made for looking for the evidence for the theory (laying aside the Good Book and the 6006BC date)- and one then can even bring in the Bible and examine some of the suggestions in it in terms of modern science- in the same way "Intelligent Designers" like Richard Dawkins have interpreted sections. From there- the theory can then equally be de-constructed. That way kids can look at any theory and evaluate pros and cons- even evolution!
Isnt that the way Archaeology and other sciences should work?
You could......but science is already taught like that.....but it's earlier scientific theories that are deconstructed.
Why has the creationist twaddle any relevance?
You could equally pick the 'theory' that King Lear could have ordered the tide to retreat and deconstruct that.