9th January 2013, 03:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 9th January 2013, 04:27 PM by vulpes.)
Whatever it's shortcomings, the publication referred to was never marketed as guidance to be rolled out across the land. It still stands out as the only systematic attempt on this scale to look at what we do when we 'evaluate'. But, it was focussed on sites in only a single county and developments which were largely (but not exclusively) linear.