19th October 2010, 09:39 PM
A massive debate? Sorry, I thought this was just a BAJR thread about an apparently humorous 'flat earthist' archaeology group on Facebook. Or did I miss something?
Would you care to outline the proposition we are meant to be debating? If it's do you agree with this CSA group, then I disagree. I've already explained why as have numerous others.
How amusingly tardy this whole debate is. It's only possible merit being in allowing people to relive their undergraduate days in the late 80s and early 90s while kicking what was then 'current' in archaeological theory. Me I prefer Traffic Cops, which reminds me....
Glad you're learning summat though BAJR.
Would you care to outline the proposition we are meant to be debating? If it's do you agree with this CSA group, then I disagree. I've already explained why as have numerous others.
How amusingly tardy this whole debate is. It's only possible merit being in allowing people to relive their undergraduate days in the late 80s and early 90s while kicking what was then 'current' in archaeological theory. Me I prefer Traffic Cops, which reminds me....
Glad you're learning summat though BAJR.