18th January 2012, 05:46 PM
I am afraid to say Oxbeast that i still stand by my comments. As for other so called associated finds this seems to be scurrilous speculation and besides i understand that to be captured as Treasure two or more base metal objects found in close association need to be of prehistoric date which i am told is pre 43 AD.
Not happy with the "nauseating case of theft from the nation" comment - that is the usual bleat expected of the heritage bloggers who have no understanding of the real world and dwell in one dominated by prejudice.
Not happy with the "nauseating case of theft from the nation" comment - that is the usual bleat expected of the heritage bloggers who have no understanding of the real world and dwell in one dominated by prejudice.