5th June 2006, 04:46 PM
Sorry,
Had to do some work.
My understanding is that the principal Natalie is a member of the IFA. Archpeople are not I think a registered RAO - they make no claim to be one.
The rates advertised for the site assistant I would say are arguably within BAJR guidelines. They are from 240 per week depending upon experience. As they say somebody with no experience can apply arguably they are advertsing for trainee grades and thus the pay is in fact "generous". I for one support the notion that new graduates should be paid to gain experience.
The supervisors job - somebody with 2 years experience - is clearly below the BAJR grade 4 minimum .
As for what action BAJR can take that is something for David to consider when he is back in work if indeed action is appropriate.
The archpeople web site only started working today.
I am happy for the thread to continue provided people are careful what they say. I think there are issues to be considered about the nature of casual employment and so on. Similarly there is the notion about how far the IFA could take disciplinary action in these circumstances or indeed if they are appropriate.
Had to do some work.
My understanding is that the principal Natalie is a member of the IFA. Archpeople are not I think a registered RAO - they make no claim to be one.
The rates advertised for the site assistant I would say are arguably within BAJR guidelines. They are from 240 per week depending upon experience. As they say somebody with no experience can apply arguably they are advertsing for trainee grades and thus the pay is in fact "generous". I for one support the notion that new graduates should be paid to gain experience.
The supervisors job - somebody with 2 years experience - is clearly below the BAJR grade 4 minimum .
As for what action BAJR can take that is something for David to consider when he is back in work if indeed action is appropriate.
The archpeople web site only started working today.
I am happy for the thread to continue provided people are careful what they say. I think there are issues to be considered about the nature of casual employment and so on. Similarly there is the notion about how far the IFA could take disciplinary action in these circumstances or indeed if they are appropriate.