10th March 2006, 05:00 PM
I think that a vital part of this case is that it is in Ireland where dealing with archaeology is a legal requirement, rather then planning guidance.
To quote the Judge from the article: the archaeology report was 'extremely important' and that it was a mandatory part of the project.
I imagine it may be much more complex in the UK. Civil stuff...
To quote the Judge from the article: the archaeology report was 'extremely important' and that it was a mandatory part of the project.
I imagine it may be much more complex in the UK. Civil stuff...