+- BAJR Federation Archaeology (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk)
+-- Forum: BAJR Federation Forums (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: The Site Hut (http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Its getting so exciting (/showthread.php?tid=2871)
Pages:
1
2
Its getting so exciting - Unitof1 - 18th March 2010
http://twitter.com/mikeheyworth/statuses/10070938241
R.I.P. PPG16 22/03/2010
Its getting so exciting - BAJR - 18th March 2010
hmmmmmmmmm :face-huh: well I will be surprised but intersted
Its getting so exciting - Unitof1 - 18th March 2010
surprised that it is out on the 22nd or that its exactly the same as ppg but with different words?
I am looking forward to the replacement for derivatives of the word: “consider”
I wonder how much it cost….
Its getting so exciting - BAJR - 18th March 2010
just surprised..... I would love to see the difference
:face-stir:
Its getting so exciting - Unitof1 - 18th March 2010
well the curators have tried to down play the use of the term "watching brief" in the last few years. which was ok with me as there are no standards for “written scheme of works” and so allowed me to develop my discard policy by about 100%
Its getting so exciting - Steven - 19th March 2010
Unitof1 Wrote:well the curators have tried to down play the use of the term "watching brief" in the last few years. which was ok with me as there are no standards for ?written scheme of works? and so allowed me to develop my discard policy by about 100%
Hi
I'm sorry but I don't understand your post. Do you mean "Written Scheme of Investigation"? The wording used in the Model 55 planning condition? As for standards, are you really saying your happy to utilise a terminology loophole to avoid carrying out quality work?
Its getting so exciting - Unitof1 - 19th March 2010
Hello stevie
by model 55 do you mean the time limits thingy in Crcular 11/95: Use of conditions in planning permission. I think I was having a bosh at this woffle as a condition
No development shall take place until a scheme specifying the methods of recording or preserving any archaeological deposits which may be affected by the approved works and including a timetable for such recording has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the agreed scheme.”
Its getting so exciting - Steven - 19th March 2010
Unitof1 Wrote:
Hello stevie
by model 55 do you mean the time limits thingy in Crcular 11/95: Use of conditions in planning permission. I think I was having a bosh at this woffle as a condition
No development shall take place until a scheme specifying the methods of recording or preserving any archaeological deposits which may be affected by the approved works and including a timetable for such recording has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the agreed scheme.”
Hi
The wording does seem a little strange but sometimes planners like to write their own conditions rather than just use the standard words, maybe they get bored!
Its getting so exciting - Unitof1 - 19th March 2010
by modell 55 do you mean 11/95
Its getting so exciting - Steven - 19th March 2010
Unitof1 Wrote:by modell 55 do you mean 11/95
Hi
The model 55 Condition is in the appendix of circular 11/95. The Circular itself is a guidance document not a condition.