20th September 2013, 10:45 PM
20th September 2013, 10:51 PM
come on in plan they are all long linears. ::::::::::::
4th October 2013, 10:35 AM
best way to learn about features is to dig them yourself. i have worked in construction quite a bit of the years and what i have seen and done on building sites has been every bit as useful as anything done on an archaeological site.
4th October 2013, 12:18 PM
richard cherrington Wrote:best way to learn about features is to dig them yourself. i have worked in construction quite a bit of the years and what i have seen and done on building sites has been every bit as useful as anything done on an archaeological site.
Too true!
I learned loads about prehistoric/RB ditches/gullies, drainage and the practicalities of digging on the last site.
It was a long running large are excavation. It rained and flooded a lot.
We had to dig many drainage channels by hand to get at the archaeology. Had some experts on site too, ex-ditch diggers.
Learned lots.
Using the water you are draining as a 'level' and as a lubricant to get the nasty clay off your spade/shovel works a treat
9th October 2013, 06:12 PM
My background in building does often give me cause to question assumptions on site. Sometimes I can be convinced, other times not. But it's nice to have a different perspective.
9th October 2013, 08:12 PM
I found a couple of bizarre ditches today on GoogleEarth, they seem to run around in circles, one inside the other, show as soil marks and, at least in 1945, were crossed by a hedge. Whole thing's about 30m in diameter and not mentioned by the HER. They don't seem to fit in well with Unit's 'linear' ditch view...wierd... }
...

9th October 2013, 10:16 PM
I have come across a few ironage/bronze age round ditches which seemed to have been crossed out by Roman ditches but I must admit that the appearance of hedges in 1945 crossing bizarre circular running ditches is a whole new subject to me. It sounds like you have rings on top of rings, I think that there was an Olympics in Britain in 1948 which might work with your description but I suspect that the cropmarks in google earth have the same origin as my long linears. Do you find that they cause you to squint?
10th October 2013, 12:51 PM
Unit, I would have thought you'd be an expert in early prehistoric ditches.............
The allotment of land into parcels.....possibly indicating ownership..............and dare I say it, prehistoric copyright?:face-stir:}
The allotment of land into parcels.....possibly indicating ownership..............and dare I say it, prehistoric copyright?:face-stir:}

10th October 2013, 01:30 PM
Dinosaur Wrote:I found a couple of bizarre ditches today on GoogleEarth, they seem to run around in circles, one inside the other, show as soil marks and, at least in 1945, were crossed by a hedge. Whole thing's about 30m in diameter and not mentioned by the HER. They don't seem to fit in well with Unit's 'linear' ditch view...wierd... }...
[h=2]lin·e·ar[/h]/ˈlɪn
![[Image: thinsp.png]](http://static.sfdict.com/dictstatic/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png)
![[Image: thinsp.png]](http://static.sfdict.com/dictstatic/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png)
adjective 1. of, consisting of, or using lines: linear design.
2. pertaining to or represented by lines: linear dimensions.
3. extended or arranged in a line: a linear series.
4. involving measurement in one dimension only; pertaining to length: linear measure.
5. of or pertaining to the characteristics of a work of art in which forms and rhythms are defined chiefly in terms of line.
weird indeed
10th October 2013, 05:14 PM
Think it's a bit late querying spelling on here!