View Full Version : South Cave Weapons Cache
TheDoc
1st April 2008, 10:37 AM
Did a piece for Radio Humberside yesterday on this unique hoard of Iron Age swords/spears (dating to c70AD). Should also be on Look North (maybe tonight). Will go on display at the Treasure House in Beverley in early May, along with temporary display looking at the conservation process and other IA metalwork from the region (including metal detecting finds loaned by the finders)
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 03:38 PM
Hi Doc,
Have you any links to web sites or other written sources for this?
Thanks
S
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Oxbeast
1st April 2008, 07:35 PM
http://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/001593.html
Surely 70AD is R-B?
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
Sparky
1st April 2008, 08:57 PM
Hi Oxbeast,
I would imagine it depends on where abouts one was located during this early period of the 'occupation'. Nevertheless, I would assume that at this early period the British Isles was more or less still IA; still lots of uprisings and skirmishes going on and little time for ubiquitous Romanisation.
S
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
1st April 2008, 11:01 PM
thats true there Sparky... up here in Scotchland, we don't see the massive hobnailed sandal of oppresion until the 79AD ish (prior intrusions accepted)
ps Spraks... sorry to have missed you in the land of the Votadinii ... up to me eyes in volly work... ah the wind and rain.
Nice one doc by the way do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar... (see top menu)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
Oxbeast
2nd April 2008, 11:28 AM
Good point, BAJR.
Looking on t'interweb, 70AD is the same year as the foundation of the fort at Lincoln, and the year before the foundation of the fort at York. Perhaps this is not so much of a "ritual" deposit as other Iron Age hoards, perhaps it is more directly related to fighting (and being beaten by) the invading Romans.
Or perhaps they had heard that things were so peaceful under the Romans that they didn't need their weapons anymore...
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
mercenary
2nd April 2008, 01:27 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD, so at South Cave it is on the Iron Age side. Just. The date of the cache of weapons is I suspect very relevant to the fact that the frontier was moving across the Humber at this date.
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
m300572
2nd April 2008, 01:31 PM
I believe that the Humber was considered a frontier boundary until 70 AD"
Still is:D They're funny folk on t'other side of t'river!!!
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Dirty Dave Lincoln
2nd April 2008, 05:49 PM
when you say funny folk t'other side of the river,which way are you looking?north or south.
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
Sparky
2nd April 2008, 09:28 PM
IRONically enough, the outbreak of the Brigantian hostilities occurs in AD69. Although they had been allied (loosely) beforehand.
This is all getting a bit Britarch like...
Yours
Whitethorn Sword Gobbler
:)
PS Hosty,
No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
S
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
2nd April 2008, 11:39 PM
Nah... to go fully Britarch... we have to digress completely from the subject... show our immense knowledge in something unrelated and then descend into some wibble about treacle ...
oh ... hang on! maybe we are!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Oxbeast
3rd April 2008, 03:15 PM
quote:No bother. Got to experience the wind and the rain from inside a few pubs. Maybe next time.
Maybe next time, choose pubs with roofs.
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
Sparky
3rd April 2008, 09:00 PM
Oxo,
I judge from your comment that you live in a Romanised part of the provence...?
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
BAJR Host
3rd April 2008, 10:19 PM
Have to say that todays digging was most pleasant! though having 12 kids as well as all the vollys, was...er... a handfull.. and not effecatious for a peacefull time
gawd i love it!
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
TheDoc
4th April 2008, 06:27 PM
do you want to add that to the BAJR calendar...
Badger, will do. The purpose of the weapons cache is no doubt going to keep lots of academics busy speculating for years to come. Personally I quite like the thought of the Parisi Liberation Front storing arms for a long guerilla campaign against the Roman invaders. The weapons show every sign of having been carefully wrapped, the spear shafts removed rather than snapped off, and the whole thing carefully concealed. Mind you, the soil would have rendered them unusable pretty rapidly if not quickly retrieved. Full report still in preparation - is meant to be published in Britannia next year.
:)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.1 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.